Michelle Smith - Ph.D. Candidate
Email: smith118@gmail.com
Phone: 406-243-4348
Fax: 406-243-6064

Office:

Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit

Natural Science Building - Room 205

Missoula, MT 59812
 
Education:

M.S., Michigan State University, 2004
B.S., Michigan State University, 2001

- 2006 Bertha Morton Scholarship

¨ 2006 NASA-MSU Professional Enhancement Award

¨ 2002-2003 Department of Zoology Fellowship – MSU

¨ 2003 Graduate Student Research Enhancement Award – MSU

¨ 2003 Lauff Research Award – Kellogg Biological Station

¨ 2002 Ecology-Evolutionary Biology, & Behavior Program Fellowship–MSU

 

Determinants of avian community structure in managed forests

Understanding factors influencing species distributions and abundances is a fundamental question in ecology. This understanding has important applications in habitat management, specifically related to the conservation of species. Despite the significance of this question, our understanding of the relationships between management and wildlife remains inadequate. One hindrance may be the continued use of concepts of questionable merit, specifically the "biodiversity" and "indicator species" concepts. Both of these concepts are based on the assumption that different species respond similarly to the same environmental factors. While this assumption is questionable, the concepts are still commonly used. It remains unclear as to whether or not these concepts are appropriate tools to guide research and management. Likewise, our understanding of wildlife-habitat relationships has been limited by our lack of knowledge as to how biotic (e.g., competition and predation) and abiotic (e.g., disturbance) factors collectively influence wildlife populations. Understanding factors that affect wildlife communities requires a consideration of both biotic and abiotic factors, as well as their relative influence, yet few studies examine these factors simultaneously. Similarly, we must also carefully consider the issue of scale, as the scale of a study can affect our inferences. Previous studies focused on fine spatial scales; however, fine-scale studies may not capture the relevant patterns and processes driving wildlife-habitat associations at broader spatial scales. Examining the major factors influencing wildlife populations with a multi-scale approach will allow me to develop a broad-scale understanding of wildlife-habitat relationships. Ultimately, this knowledge will inform managers of the predicted effects of management practices on wildlife.