Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility
The guidelines and standards required as part of the Resolution Agreement with the Department of Education (DOE) and the Office of Civil Rights (OCR) and the upcoming EITA Policy and Procedures are largely industry standards and are listed on this site. The goal of the EITA Working Group and this site is transparency so there should be no surprises in the process. Please report anything you believe we should include here.
No, we are not alone. We are among a number of leading universities who have or are addressing information technology accessibliity:
Infrastructure, such as Moodle or classroom podiums, will be the responsibility of specific departments. For those examples, UMOnline and IT respectively. Campus support exists so that closed captioning and instructional web page and software evaluation can be hanlded by others. (Call x-EITA or 243-3482 for information.
Nevertheless, each individual is responsible for providing accessible course content and EIT (electronic and information technology).
One desktop may not seem like an issue. However, accessible software may exist in that same category that meets the user and project requirements. We should avoid whenever possible building IT processes that are inaccessible and thus will require future changes. And, as soon as software becomes institutionalized by being used by 2 or more individuals or integrated into work processes, that danger arises.
Nevertheless, the current practice is to grant conditional use for software used for only 1 or 2 individuals when:
Please read more about the UM software evaluation process.
Besides the support listed at the top of the page, here are some quick ways to get support for the various accessibility related categories:
Have you researched other options? If several are moving to adopt it, are you continuing to build something that will most likely need changing in the future? Why start down an inaccessible road if there is an accessible alternative that meets your other criteria?
We are building a body of knowledge with other universities about accessible software. We may already know of an alternative software that will meet your needs. Please review the accessible software and hardware section..
Our goal is academic freedom and access for all. The Dear Colleague letter from the Department of Education / Office of Civil Rights (June 29, 2010) is clear in stating that inaccessible materials constitute discrimination and that educational materials and activities need to be accessible even when no identified students are in the course.
So, even a single use of inaccessible material is non-compliant. Support is in place to help you prepare in a timely manner (see #1 above). However, it may be pedagogically important to include inaccessible resources once for spontaneous moments while providing accommodations that are equally effective, integrated and timely (see above for . If the resource is to be used a second time, it should be made accessible.
That said, most non-STEM topic documents can be made accessible on the fly by sending them as an email attachment to firstname.lastname@example.org. IT is supporting campus toward accessible web content and can provide testing of sites that are in question. Many professionally produced recordings already have captions (videos) or transcripts (audio recordings). Audio descriptions for video are also growing. The list of known accessible educational and business software will grow during the self-study and beyond.
The Resolution Agreement does not require us to go beyond what the law requires. The draft policy and procedures are also consistent with legal requirements. The bottom line is that the University is taking effective steps designed to ensure that EIT used in University programs and activities is accessible to individuals with disabilities. Accommodations then become a matter of dealing with EIT that is generally accessible but which requires specific individual accommodations.In the final analysis individual accommodations are more expensive than system modification because they need to be repeated with each requesting student and most frequently require equal time from a staff person. This is especially true when we factor in the fact that system modification has benefits for more than just individuals with disabilities.
The policy doesn't state that all paper documents need to be converted into electronic ones. However, it is true that electronic documents are much more accessible to individuals using screen readers or other assistive technology.
In most cases, our documents originated as electronic documents, so providing them in that form isn't too difficult. Here are some caveats and solutions: