Accessible Navigation. Go to: Navigation Main Content Footer
 

Aid in Dying: A panel discussion on the ethical implications of Baxter v. Montana

Monday, November 9th, 7 pm, GBB 123

Join us for a panel discussion on the ethical implications of Baxter v. Montana

The Montana Supreme Court heard arguments on September 2, 2009, in Baxter v.
Montana
, the case in which a lower court recognized the right of terminally ill, mentally
competent adult Montanans to choose aid in dying under the State Constitution. The
Montana Supreme Court will consider whether to uphold the landmark decision issued
last December by First Judicial Court Judge Dorothy McCarter

Panelists:

Scott Crichton is the Executive Director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Montana

Mark J. Hanson, Ph.D., is a lecturer in Liberal Studies at the University of Montana and adjunct associate professor in Health Professions at the University's College of Technology.  Prior to coming to Montana, Dr. Hanson was Associate for Ethics and Society at The Hastings Center, a bioethics research institute in Garrison, New York.

Con Kelly is a Montana native. He holds a Ph.D from Laval University, Quebec, Canada and a J.D. from the University of Montana. For over twenty years he served as ethicist for two multi-state health care systems in Ohio and Colorado. Currently retired, he is a program consultant for Centura Health, Denver, Colorado.

Baxter v. Montana In The News:

Click here for a New York Time's Article on the Baxter v. Montana Case

Responses to the December 2008 Court Decision

http://www.aul.org/MT_Baxter_v_State

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=82928

The Center for Ethics

1000 E. Beckwith Avenue

Missoula, MT 59801

406.243-6605

dane.scott@mso.umt.edu