Recommendations of the
We recommend that the following
guidelines be used for judging whether COT courses are collegiate and should be
offered for full University credit. But
we also note that Mountain Campus courses have not been explicitly tested by
the same standards, and that some of them are perhaps not collegiate. We therefore recommend that all future
courses submitted to ASCRC for approval be tested by
these standards.
We believe for a course to be offered
for BA/BS credit, it should demonstrate the following standards, OR it should
argue why a particular standard should not be applied:
1)
Course presents an appropriate balance between theory, concepts, application,
and descriptive material given the topic and nature of the course.
2) Course utilizes college level textbook(s),
FacPac, materials, etc. and not solely manuals, industrial notes or directions,
etc.
3) Course has proper balance between course
content or structure (i.e., labs, discussion section, etc.) and the number of
assigned college course credits.
4) Course requires proper prerequisites, if
needed.
5) Course utilizes appropriate testing and
assessment techniques given the topic and nature of the course.
6) Course should not be remedial for college
work.
Our committee makes the following
recommendations to ASCRC with regard to efforts to integrate College of
Technology (COT) curriculum with curricula on the Mountain campus:
1.
2.
3. As long as
students meet their General Education Requirements
and requirements in the department of their major, it seems unfair to penalize
students or to dictate to students as to what their “elective’ courses should
be. Our current policies disadvantage
COT students who wish to pursue a baccalaureate degree on the Mountain
campus. One suggestion would be for
ASCRC to consider raising the number of T designated
credits accepted from students toward total credit requirements for graduation.