ASCRC Minutes 11/27/07
Members Present: L. Economides,
I.
Crummy, J. Graham, S. Gauthier, E. Henderson, S. Lodmell, J. Luckowski, P.
Muench, K. Nalty, M. Nielsen, L.
Tangedahl, H. Thompson, G. Weix
Members
Absent/Excused: J. Burfeind, J. Cox, M. Hoell P. Silverman
Ex-Officio Present: D. Micus, A. Walker-Andrews
Guest: Associate Dean Tompkins
Chair Thompson called the meeting to order at 2:15 p.m.
The minutes from 11/13/07 were approved.
Communications:
Business Items: -
Curriculum Review
Science Subcommittee Follow-up
The negotiated changes between Geosciences and Geography
were briefly explained and the proposals were approved.
Education and Fine Arts Subcommittee Follow-up
Drama 107A has three sections and is also offered for non-majors. The repeatability simplifies the advising for
the department. The proposal was
approved.
Humanities Subcommittee Follow-up
Although Film Studies agreed to the 9 credits repeatable rather than 12 for
UG 381 Studies in Film, Graduate Council will only approve 6 credits
repeatable because the course is offered for graduate students and only 6
credits of 300 level courses count towards a graduate degree. Although History does not consider the title
change of UG 376 American Constitutional
History to 1864 to Problems in
American Constitutional History significant, ASCRC would still like to see
a syllabus.
Writing Courses
The writing courses were reviewed and approved by the
writing committee. ASCRC concurred with
the summary.
Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Possibilities – Provost
Engstrom
National discussions are taking place with regards to the idea of a liberal
education. The undergraduate degree
could be designed around a larger conceptual context of a major issue or
question. After students are exposed to the question they would identify what
tools and knowledge was needed to better understand the question and could
choose their major according to how they would like to contribute to finding a
solution. This context would also help guide their choice of breadth requirements
(see diagram). 
In this way an undergraduate degree would be more than career
preparation. It would address how the
student’s education fits in with the larger concerns of the world and be built on
exploration and integration rather than checking off requirements.
It was suggested that the context areas or questions could be the general
education perspectives so that general education is built around ideas not
disciplines. Students perform better
when they are impassioned about real life issues.
The Provost suggested the formation of a subcommittee to flush out the
ideas. Then an open invitation would be
given to campus to design courses and criteria would need to be developed in
order to evaluate interdisciplinary courses.
The meeting was adjourned at 4:00.