III Periodic Review of Centers (Academic Policy 100.o)
Clinical
A.
Written Report Summary:
1. Purpose: The Clinical Psychology Center (CPC) was
established in 1967 as a part of the doctoral program in clinical psychology at
the
2. Objectives: 1) to provide a location to facilitate the
development of strong clinical skills in clinical interviewing, diagnostic
assessment, test administration and interpretation, and psychotherapy for
clinical psychology graduate students; 2) advance the science of psychology
through empirical research; and 3) to provide high quality, affordable
psychological services to individuals, couples, and families in Missoula and
the surrounding areas.
3.
Activities: Clinical Training –During the academic
year, 20-25 doctoral students see three clients or more each. In addition, students see clients for intake
assessments, psychological/educational assessments, and crisis/walk-in
appointments. Students are supervised by
three faculty members for a full year.
Faculty members meet with students in both group format (2 hours weekly)
and individually (1 hour per week).
Research- The CPC serves as a location in which
the varied interests of faculty and students come together resulting in a broad
range of projects which are intended to advance the science of psychology.
Education - The CPC houses three classrooms.
In addition to the clinical supervision of graduate students, numerous
graduate courses are taught at the CPC.
In addition to hosting study group meetings and area collaborative
meetings, the CPC occasionally provides workshops designed to provide area
practitioners with the information necessary to remain current in a rapidly
developing field.
4. Other organizations involved: None
5. Reporting line:
The CPC is a facility within the Department of Psychology. The Director of the CPC reports to the Chair
of the Department of Psychology. Matters
of policy and budget are typically developed by the Director of the CPC and
agreed upon within both the Clinical and full faculty of the Department of
Psychology.
6. Relationships with academic units: The CPC is a facility within the Department of Psychology
and has established a collaborative relationship with the
7. Similar programs: There are no other doctoral training programs in clinical psychology
in the state of
8. Budget:
a. 1. Current faculty and percentage of
time: The Director is a full-time,
tenure-track faculty member in the Department of Psychology. In return for the administrative oversight of
the CPC, the Director receives a one course teaching load reduction. Faculty routinely donate
80-90% of workshop revenues to the CPC.
They also donate 24/7 crises coverage through a pager system
Current staff: The Assistant to
the Director is a full-time graduate student in the Clinical Psychology
Training Program. The position is
supported by a University assistantship.
The Receptionist (administrative associate I) is a member of the
Psychology Department staff.
2. Need and cost for new faculty
(next five years):
3. Need for other personnel: The CPC and the Department would be much better
served by a director who did not have the same full-time faculty
responsibilities as members of the faculty of the Department of
Psychology. Accordingly, the CPC seeks a
˝ time Clinical Director of the CPC, salaried at $30,000.
b. Use and anticipated needs (next five
years) of University Resources:
1. Library: Similar to the
Psychology Department. The CPC maintains
a small library of clinically relevant resources which are funded through the
CPC budget and private donations.
2. Technology/equipment: Additional
Grizcard readers within the CPC, regular updating of computer technology which
supports 30 to 40 graduate students in maintaining confidential clinical
records, and computer and software resources necessary to maintain the security
and confidentiality of clinical records at the administrative level.
3. Facility and space: The
facility is crowded and heavily scheduled most days. Recently, the Department of Psychology
explored the possibility of adding a second floor to the CPC. Such an addition would go a long way to
alleviating the space problems at the CPC.
The estimated cost is $650,000.
c. Source of Funding (Provide figures
for the last fiscal year):
The Department of Psychology operates
the clinic with revenue that is entirely based on faculty/student work.
Donations of funds and resources to the CPC from faculty members are assessed
an administrative fee of 5.5% which increases costs to CPC. (This fee is waived
for similar entities on campus).
|
Income |
|
|
Expenditures |
|
|
|
General
Funds |
$0 |
0% |
Personnel |
$0 |
0% |
|
Grants |
$0 |
0% |
Operations: |
|
|
|
Other: Clients Copying |
$ 6536.5
953.15
176.00 4740.00 |
54% 7% 1% 29% |
Supplies Communications Workshops Equipment (copier) Admin. Assessment |
$5284.15
2503.93
1604.45
1113.45 1591.00 |
44% 21% 13% 9% 13% |
|
Total |
12045.65 |
|
Total |
$12096.98 |
|
Anticipated source of funding for the
next five years:
The Department of Psychology and the CPC have repeatedly requested some
support from the University to alleviate the fund-raising burden on the
faculty. A waiving of the 5.5% administrative fee and a budget of $15,000 would
go a long way to supporting the educational and service mission of the CPC.
B. Review and Approval Process
2. The Faculty Senate through its Chair,
ECOS, and Committees as appropriate shall recommend continuance or
discontinuance by vote.
Review
in terms of Scope as stated in academic policy 100.0
To provide instruction, scholarship, or service to the University, state or
world by: (1) focusing attention on an
area of strength and/or addressing a critical issue, or (2) facilitating
collaborative, multi-disciplinary endeavors to combine resources from several
programs or institutions to address issues of common interest.
Review
in terms of the University’s mission.
§
Comments:
Exploration of new construction for additional space needed
resulting from growth in patients, records and technology. The center is requesting waiver of
administrative fee of 5.5%, based on other centers on campus. ECOS would ask that centers are treated
consistently when it comes to fees and charges.
§
Does
ECOS/Faculty Senate consider this center controversial?
No.
§
Is
the relationship with academic units beneficial?
Yes, this center resides within the Department of
Psychology, and provides outreach and service to the Missoula community through
clinical work.
§
Is
the program revenue neutral or does it consume more resources than it generates?
If so, is the use of University resources justified?
Yes, faculty donate significant portion of time and
effort. The University has agreed to
fund a ˝ time Director at $30,000 as requested by the Center to help alleviate
faculty.
§
Is
the entity making progress toward objectives?
Yes
Recommendation: Continue