III Periodic Review of Centers (Academic Policy 100.0)
    

Center for the Rocky Mountain West


 

A. Written Report Summary:

1.       Purpose:  The Center for the Rocky Mountain West is a resource for a region which its people care deeply about - a resource they can use to better understand the region's past and present and to explore and share aspirations for its future.

2.       Objectives:  Ÿ To create an array of programs and activities, such as conferences, forums, and institutes that bring regional thinkers and leaders together to discuss the region and to utilize the humanities to deepen our regional understanding of common issues and potentials.  Ÿ To produce a variety of informational materials such as books, articles, news pieces, web sites, and other publications that advance understanding of the region’s history and culture and the challenges and opportunities for the region’s future.  Ÿ To conduct new and unique forms of inquiry and study into the region’s history and current transformation and to convey new insights and ideas gained from this study to others in the region.  Ÿ To produce new and innovative databases and information systems that can be used by thinkers and decision makers to better understand and advance the region.  Ÿ To create an interdisciplinary forum within which students and faculty at The University of Montana can explore and research regional issues and enhance their understanding of the Rocky Mountain West as a region and the role of Montana within this larger region.  Ÿ To be available to the region’s communities and decision makers as a resource, consultant, and collaborator as they attempt to address community and regional needs.

3.       Activities: A valuable outlet for regional scholarship has been the Center’s journal, Changing Landscape, designed as another resource westerners can use to better understand their region.
Humanities and Culture
offers opportunities to celebrate the region's culture, understand better its heritage, and weave a regional identity from threads of difference and commonality through public conversations - lectures, symposia, exhibits, publications - and scholarly research. Examples of conference activities include “A.B. Guthrie’s The Big Sky- After 50 Years” in 1997, Joseph Kinsey Howard: Writer of Place and Trans-Border Crusader” in 1998, and Saints and Others: Mormonism in the North American West” in 2002.  A cross-boarder activity includes a lecture exchange between The University of Montana and the
University of Calgary.  The Center has periodically sponsored a monthly half-hour public radio program “Speaking of That…”hosted by Pat Williams.
The Regional Economy program has three focuses: 1) Larger changes in the economy and how these translate into change among individual communities and sub regions, with an emphasis on supporting community and business leaders as they consider options for the future; 2) Challenges and opportunities tied to the continuing development of a "transnational" economy in the region, resulting from the steady reduction of obstacles to trade and interchange across the U.S.-Canada border; and 3) Changing relations between the region's economy and natural environment, recognizing the growing importance of the environment as an extractive resource, biological system, and multi-faceted amenity, and further recognizing that achieving balance among these is a key to the region's future economic prosperity. Activities include: 
Ÿ Development and distribution of the web-based Regional Economies Assessment Database or READ System for systematic evaluation of sub-state regional economies.  Ÿ Special studies and reports on economic development and change among sub-regions and communities of the region and on-going support of area planning initiatives throughout the region.  ŸPresentations throughout the region on important changes underway in the region's economy.  Ÿ Assessments of cross-border developments in regional trade, transportation, travel, and community interchange.  ŸPeriodic conferences examining major developments in the region's economy and prospects for the future.
The Center's work in regional policy raises issues, conducts research, provides information, and works in partnership with others to create forums in which people who care about the region can reach across the ideological divides that often prevent them from working productively together. Activities include: Forums for public land dialogue; “Cities of the Rockies’ conference which was an outgrowth of an ongoing series of Summer Institutes sponsored by the Center to address important issues affecting the future of the U.S. and Canadian Rocky Mountain West; Headwaters News, a daily on-line news service for the Rocky Mountain West viewed for approximately 4,000 of the region’s most influential policymakers, journalists, educators, environmental and industry leaders, urban planners, Native American Leaders, and state and federal government agencies and staffs; and a weekly op-ed page called Perspective.  Emerging and planned activities include: 
Montana on the Move, a project designed to help Montana’s communities create an environment that maximizes Montana’s ability to prosper both economically and culturally; the Inter-University Consortium on Federal Lands; and the Tribal Leaders’ Symposium.

 

4.       Other organizations involved:  The Center’s Advisory Board members include President Dennison, Vice President for Research Dyer, College of Arts and Science Dean Fetz, and the  College of Natural Resources and Conservation Dean Brown.

5.       Reporting line: One member of the senior staff serves as the Center’s Director, reporting to the University administration through the Vice President for Research and Development.  Most of the Center’s decisions are reached by consensus at weekly senior staff meetings, and the directorship is intended to rotate among members of the senior staff much as departmental chairmanships rotate.

6.   Relationships with academic units:  The four senior members of the Center, William Farr, Daniel Kemmis, Larry Swanson, and Pat Williams teach not only at The University of Montana but also, through frequent guest lectures and speeches, throughout the region on history, forestry, arts, journalism, political science, and environmental studies.  William Farr, the former chair of the Department of History continues to teach history and has developed the Center’s course on Regionalism and the West with Pat Williams.  Larry Swanson shares his findings about the transitions currently under way in Montana and through the Rockies with students in education, geography, sociology, environmental studies, and forestry.  Daniel Kemmis and Pat Williams teach courses in environmental studies and offer guest lectures in other disciplines.  The Center also brings in a number of visiting scholars and lecturers. The Center staff are involved in a broad range of ongoing research and writing activities that are detailed in the report.

7.   Similar programs:  There are no other programs in Montana that have the same focus as the Rocky Mountain West.  Because the Center’s mission complements in many ways the missions of the University’s Public Policy Research Institute and the Bolle Center, there is a high level of coordination with those programs. Other working relationships have been established with regional and public policy institutes outside of Montana.

8.   Budget:
a.  1. Current faculty and percentage of time: 
                    William Farr, Associate Director of Humanities and Culture              .5
         Current staff:   
                    Daniel Kemmis, Director                                                             1.0
                    Pat Williams, Senior Fellow in Public Policy                                 1.0
                    Larry Swanson, Associate Director of Regional
Economics            1.0

                        Greg Lakes, Headwaters Editor                                                   1.0

                        Gloria Phillip, Program Assistant for Humanities & Culture 1.0

                        Jeanie Thompson, Administrative Assistant                                  1.0

                        Doug Lawrence, Information Systems Specialist                           1.0

                        Shellie Nelson, Headwaters Assistant Editor                                1.0

     2. Need and cost for new faculty (next five years)/ 3. Need for other personnel: 

To ensure the long-term sustainability of the Center, to assure that Center senior personnel can be replaced through recruitment as necessary to attract high quality and experienced persons, and to provide greater flexibility in the allocation of senior personnel to emerging needs and opportunities that may not have immediate grant or contract support, the Center proposes to initiate a Center faculty fellow endowment fund to support at least three senior fellow positions.  The intent is that each fellow endowment will be complemented by an agreement with a cooperating UM department to support the regular teaching of at least one class each year by the Center fellow.
                                                     
b. Use and anticipated needs (next five years) of University Resources:  
     1.
Library, 2. Technology/equipment, 3. Facility and space:  There are no substantial           changes foreseen in the Center’s needs in these categories.  Any substantial expansion           in Center activities or budgets would be both driven and paid for by new grants,   contracts, or endowment income.   
         
c. Source of Funding (last fiscal year):     

General Funds

209,780

33.86%

Personnel

543,800

87.77%

Grants

221,935

35.82%

Operations

22,439

3.62%

**Other

187,834

30.32%

Programs

53,310

8.61%

Total

619,549

100.00%

Total

619,549

100.00%

                 **Includes sales and service, donations, interest earnings from endowment, SPABA
           5-Yr. Totals

Grants & Contracts

State

Endowment

Misc

Total

$1,378,2473

$1,012,816

$766,522

$156,042

$3,313,623

42%

31%

23%

5%

100%


Anticipated source of funding for the next five years:  
The Center expects to expand their endowment base by approximately $2.5 million over the next five years, and to expand grant and contract support for the operating budget.


 

B. Review and Approval Process
 
2.  The Faculty Senate through its Chair,
ECOS, and Committees as appropriate shall recommend continuance or discontinuance by vote.

Review in terms of Scope as stated in academic policy 100.0
To provide instruction, scholarship, or service to the University, state or world by:  (1) focusing attention on an area of strength and/or addressing a critical issue, or (2) facilitating collaborative, multi-disciplinary endeavors to combine resources from several programs or institutions to address issues of common interest.

 

 

  • Comments: By what criteria are the members of the Center appointed (for example, the latest appointment – Bob Brown)? They talk about their coordination with other programs, but more concrete evidence of this would be helpful.
                In terms of the scope as stated in academic policy 100.0: 1) Yes, the Center does focus attention on their strengths and addresses important, critical issues of the region – extending to trans-border issues with
    Canada. 2) The Center does facilitate many inter-disciplinary events, activities, and publications around the region, as well as functioning as a resource center for northwest.
  • Controversial: Yes, this center is seen as somewhat controversial.
  • Relationship with academic units beneficial: According to their report, there are four senior members of the Center who teach courses not only at UM, but also give lectures and speeches throughout the region.
  • Revenue: The initial understanding that most faculty have, is that this Center would be self-sufficient and depend on few state (university) funds. This is not the case. Over one third of Center funding comes from state money. They are working on expanding their endowment base by expanding grant and contract support for the operating budget – which is a necessity for continuing operation as a center.
  • Progress towards objectives: The Center has numerous successful out-reach activities that demonstrate their dedication to achieve their stated purpose and objectives. They provide a unique function for the region, being the only center that focuses on the Northwest.

 

Recommendation:    ECOS recommends that the CRMW be continued. However, rather than continuing to expand the Center, a greater effort should be made to become less dependent on state funds through more aggressive fund-raising and grant writing. As funds increase, the Center should reinstate and strengthen programming. Based on funding and programming concerns, ECOS recommends that CRMW be reviewed again in two years to assess how CRMW is progressing in terms of ECOS’s suggestions.

 

Justification:  The academic contributions that CRMW provides are beneficial to UM as are the state- and region-wide services.

            Part of the reason this center is controversial is because its budget is heavily weighted towards personnel. After talking with senior fellows from the CRMW, ECOS found that: 1) the Center has changed over time, thus funding sources and expectations have changed. 2) Salaries reflect competitive market value. 3) Personnel (circa 84% of overall budget) are fixed costs, whereas the resources for the budget from endowment funds fluctuate with the market.