General
Education Committee Annual Report, 2007-2008
MEMBERSHIP
G.G.
Weix, Anthropology & ASCRC (Chair) 2008
Douglas MacDonald, Anthropology 2010
Don
Morton, Computer Science 2010
Kate
Shanley, Native American Studies 2010
Don
Potts, Forestry 2010
Frank
Rosenzweig, DBS 2009
Samantha
Hines, Mansfield Library 2009
Stephen
Kalm, Music 2009
Karen
Hill / Debbie Sloan, College of Technology-Applied Arts & Sciences 2009
_________________, (Professional Schools) 2008
ADDITIONAL REPRESENTATIVES (Ex-Officio)
Arlene
Walker-Andrews, Associate Provost
David
Micus, Registrar
Planning
· Subcommittees were established to create criteria and learning goals for each of the requirements. Members are listed below.
|
Group II: Mathematics |
Group |
|
|
|
Group |
Group VIII: Ethics and Human Values |
|
|
|
Group IIIb
Symbolic Systems |
Group IX: American and European
Perspectives |
|
|
|
Group IV: Expressive Arts |
Group X: Indigenous and Global
Perspectives |
|
|
|
Group V: Literary and Artistic Studies |
Group XI: Natural Sciences |
|
|
|
Group VI: Historical and Cultural
Studies |
|
||
·
Chair Weix researched enrollment for current
general education courses and shared the data with the committee (appended). She attended a College of Arts and Sciences Chairs
Meeting to prepare them for the upcoming review of general education
courses. A tentative timeline was set
in consultation with ECOS.
3/3/08 General Education
Committee meeting to finalize criteria
3/11/08 Draft criteria to ASCRC for discussion
3/18/08 ASCRC continue discussion
3/20/08
Feedback from ASCRC on criteria
4/3/08 Criteria to ECOS
4/4/08 Criteria sent to senators and department
chairs for consideration
4/10/08 Criteria discussed at Faculty Senate
meeting
5/1/08 Criteria voted on by Faculty Senate
5/8/08 Deadline memo sent to all faculty
9/26/08 Curriculum
review and general education review deadline -
current
general education courses will lose their designation if not submitted
General Education Criteria and Learning
Goals
The Committee discussed the criteria and outcomes
and made several revisions prior to submitting to ASCRC. ASCRC then made a few changes that went back
to the General Education Committee. The
draft went to the Faculty Senate as information on April 10th and
there was an open forum on April 16th. There were concerns regarding the Ethics and
Human Values criteria and the subcommittee was requested to revise the
requirements. The Mathematics
Subcommittee also made revisions after the draft went to the Faculty Senate. The addition of American Sign Language to the
Modern and Classical Languages requirement caused concern by the MCLL
department. These issues still need to
be addressed. The final draft is appended.
General Education Form
The committee reviewed the form and made several changes. (Appended)
______________________________________________________________________________
General Education Criteria/ Outcomes
5/1/08
|
1) achieving a grade of C-or better in one of the following
courses which address different aspects of mathematical literacy: Math 107,
109, 111, 112, 117, 121, 130, or a mathematics course of 3 or more credits
for which one of these is a prerequisite. 2) achieving a score of 50 or better on the CLEP College Algebra
Test, the CLEP College Precalculus Test, or the
CLEP College Mathematics Test. Students must complete the mathematical literacy requirement by
the time they have earned 30 credits; if not, they must register for a
mathematical sciences course every semester until they have completed the
requirement. Because many other courses at the university assume some
mathematical literacy, it is strongly recommended that all students complete
their mathematical literacy requirement as soon as possible. |
|
|
Criteria
|
Learning Goals: |
Group III
Students are encouraged to complete their modern and classical language or
symbolic systems courses early, so that they can apply those skills to upper
division coursework.
|
Group III Modern and Classical
Languages |
|
|
Criteria: Courses must encompass the comprehensive study of a natural language,
excluding written, spoken contemporary
English, with the aim of achieving at least a basic functional competency in
that language. The course should follow a rigorous and pedagogically sound
methodology and practice. Language courses proposed outside of current MCLL
offerings must be approved by the MCLL |
Learning Goals: Upon completion of the Modern and Classical Languages sequence the
student will have a basic functional knowledge of a second natural language
sufficient to: 1.
read and write if the language is classical, such as Latin; 2.
speak and aurally comprehend, if the language does not have a written
tradition, such as Salish; 3.
perform all four skills (speaking, aural comprehension,
reading, and writing) if the language is modern and has a written tradition,
such as Japanese or French. 4.
demonstrate both receptive (visual comprehension) and
expressive (manual production) proficiency if the language is American Sign
Language. |
|
Group III Symbolic Systems These
systems facilitate communication in specialized ways but do not comprise a
spoken or written language by which members of a culture typically
communicate with each other. |
|
|
Criteria 1. rigorously present a mapping between a real-world system and a
human abstraction of the system. 2. applies analysis, reasoning and creative thinking in the
understanding and manipulation of symbolic codes. 3.
utilizes alternative
methods of communication, perception, and expression in order to encourage
rigorous thinking. |
Learning
Goals 1. demonstrate an understanding of the symbols and the
transformations of the system 2. relay and interpret information in terms of the given
symbolic system. 3. apply creative thinking using the symbolic system in
order to solve problems and communicate ideas; |
|
Group IV Expressive Arts |
|
|
Criteria
|
Learning
Goals Upon
completion of this perspective students will be able to: 1.
express
themselves in the making of an original work or creative performance; 2.
understand the
genres and/or forms that have shaped the medium; and 3.
critique the quality of their own work and that of others. |
|
Group V Literary and Artistic Studies |
|
|
Criteria Courses
cover a number of works in one or more of the various forms of artistic
representation; they also establish a framework and context for analysis of
the structure and significance of these works. In addition, these courses provide
mechanisms for students 1) to receive instruction on the methods of analysis
and criticism, 2) to develop arguments about the works from differing critical
perspectives. |
Learning
goals 1.
analyze works
of art with respect to structure and significance within literary and
artistic traditions, including emergent movements and forms; and 2.
develop coherent arguments that critique these works from a
variety of approaches, such as historical, aesthetic, cultural,
psychological, political, and philosophical. |
|
Group VI: Historical and Cultural
Studies |
||
|
Criteria The course justification should explain the approach and focus with
respect to its chronological, geographical, and/or topical content. A
methodological component (e.g. historiography or ethnography) must be
apparent. |
Learning Goals 1.
synthesize ideas and information with a view
to understanding the causes and consequences of historical developments and
events; 2.
evaluate texts or artifacts within their
historical and/or cultural contexts; 3.
analyze human
behavior, ideas, and institutions within their respective historical and/or
cultural contexts.
|
|
|
Group
VII Social Science |
||
|
Criteria Courses: 1.
systematically
study individuals, groups, or social institutions; 2.
analyze
individuals, groups, or social problems and structures; and/or 3. give considerable attention to ways in which
conclusions and generalizations are developed and justified as well as the
methods of data collection and analysis. |
1.
Learning
Goals 2.
use theory in
explaining these individual, group, or social phenomena; and/or 3. understand, assess, and evaluate how conclusions and
generalizations are justified based on data |
|
|
Group VIII Ethics and Human
Values Ethics and Human Values courses
familiarize students with one or more traditions of ethical thought. These
courses rigorously present the basic concepts and forms of reasoning that
define and distinguish each tradition. The focus of these courses may be on
one or more of these traditions, or on a concept such as justice or the good
life as conceptualized within one or more of these traditions, or on a
professional practice within a particular tradition. |
|
|
Criteria 1.
Courses focus
on one or more of the specific traditions of ethical thought (either Western
or non-Western), on basic ethical topics such as justice or the good life as
seen through the lens of one or more traditions of ethical thought, or on a
professional practice within a particular tradition of ethical thought. 2. Courses provide a rigorous analysis of the basic
concepts and forms of reasoning which define the traditions, the ethical
topics, or the professional practices that are being studied. |
Learning
goals 1.
correctly apply
the basic concepts and forms of reasoning from the tradition or professional
practice they studied to ethical issues that arise within those traditions or
practices; 2.
analyze and critically evaluate the basic concepts and
forms of reasoning from the tradition or professional practice they studied.
|
|
Group IX: American and European
Perspectives |
|
|
Criteria Courses focus on either area and can be comparative in
content or approach. The courses are
broad in theme, geography, or chronology. They are foundational and prepare
students for further study by raising core questions of an academic
discipline. |
Learning
Goals 1. Demonstrate
informed and reasoned understanding of American and/or European
historical and contemporary behavior, ideas, institutions, and culture; and 2. Analyze and evaluate what is distinctive and
significant about the American and/or European experience and legacy. |
|
Group X Indigenous and Global
Perspectives |
|
|
Criteria Indigenous
and/or global courses will familiarize students with the values, histories,
and institutions of two or more societies through the uses of comparative
approaches. Indigenous
perspective courses address the longstanding tenure of a particular people in
a particular geographical region, their histories, cultures, and ways of
living as well as their interaction with other groups, indigenous and
non-indigenous. Global
perspective courses adopt a broad focus with respect to time, place, and
subject matter and one that is transnational and/or multi-cultural/ethnic in
nature. Whether the cultures or
societies under study are primarily historical or contemporary, courses
investigate significant linkages or interactions that range across time and
space. |
Learning
Goals 1. place human behavior and cultural ideas into a wider
(global/indigenous) framework, and enhance their understanding of the complex
interdependence of nations and societies and their physical environments; 2. demonstrate an awareness of the diverse ways humans
structure their social, political, and cultural lives; and 3. analyze and compare the rights and responsibilities of
citizenship in the 21st century including those of their own
societies and cultures. |