Center Review

The Office of the Provost is in the process of ensuring that all documents on this website are accessible. If you need an accessible version of any document that has not yet been converted please contact the Office of the Provost at (406) 243-4689 or by e-mail: provost@umontana.edu.

Centers at the University of Montana are approved and periodically assessed according to UM Policy 103: Establishment and Periodic Review of Academic Institutes, Bureaus, Centers, Stations, Labs, and Other Similar Entities.

Creating a new center

Center Review Process

Centers are reviewed every five years according to a rotating schedule.

1. Prepare and submit a Center Review Report

  • Prepare the report based on the guidelines for the Center Review Report (due Oct 15).
  • The center director will also submit a list of five potential external reivewers ranked by order of preference to the Office of the Provost (due Sept 15).
    • The list of potential reviewers should not include anyone with a real or perceived conflict of interest, for example, former students or close collaborators.

2. The External Evaluator's Review

  • The evaluator will be selected/invited by the Associate Provost in consultation with the center director.
  • The evaluator will review the center's report and conduct a remote review (via phone, Skype, etc.).
  • The center director is responsible for scheduling the remote interviews and providing an agenda to the reviewer.
  • The Office of the Provost does not provide the honorarium. The center director must facilitate the payment of a modest honorarium (typically $250) upon receipt of the report.
  • The interviews should include:
    • Center Director
    • Faculty and staff affiliated with the center
    • The Vice President for Research and Creative Scholarship
    • The direct supervisor of the center
    • The Associate Provost
    • Others as makes sense for each individual center

3. Faculty Senate Review

  • The Executive Committee of the Senate (ECOS) will review the center's report as well as the evaluation provided by the external reviewer.
  • ECOS will recommend continuance or discontinuance of the center. (Past ECOS center reviews)