Main menu:

Site search

Categories

Tags

Blogroll

Defense Case Ends with Peronard

scalesthumbnail-copy.jpg Defense attorney David Bernick concluded the defense case by calling the EPA’s Libby On-Site Coordinator, Paul Peronard, back to the stand. Bernick and Peronard sparred for over an hour, with Bernick asking questions regarding EPA Region 8’s role within the larger agency.

Bernick showed Peronard several letters and memoranda to, from, and between EPA employees and administrators, including a few statements in which Peronard purportedly stated that he would not return to Libby unless he could be “king.” Peronard showed great unwillingness to give simple responses to Bernick’s questions, instead vociferously objecting to Bernick’s questions and giving long and difficult responses. Bernick several times asked for Judge Molloy to instruct Peronard to answer the questions, and occasionally moved the court to strike Peronard’s testimony as non-responsive.

Once Bernick finished, prosecutor Kevin Cassidy asked Peronard a much shorter series of questions to clarify Peronard’s difficulty with Bernick’s questions. Peronard reiterated his concerns with Bernick’s questions, and also stated that he had wanted to be “king” in the sense that he wanted to be in charge of the EPA operation in Libby, as the EPA effort had previously suffered from several people concurrently sharing authority, which had led to confusion and wasted effort.

At the conclusion of Peronard’s testimony, the three individual defendants rested. Bernick, for W.R. Grace, wanted to introduce one last exhibit, a summary of Peronard’s statements to the Libby Community Advisory Group made in 2003. This required the jury to return for just a few minutes, at which time the exhibit was introduced and Cassidy asked a few questions.

At this point, the evidentiary portion of the trial was done. Molloy told the jurors to return tomorrow at 8:30 a.m. for closing arguments, with Molloy promising to hold the attorneys to strict time limits. With the jury excused, Molloy then prepared to hold argument on jury instructions for the rest of the afternoon, and if need be, into the evening.

Mark Lancaster – posted 5 p.m.

Comments

Comment from Mike Crill Missoula,Mt
Time May 6, 2009 at 12:00 am

I find it rather odd( I am kiddin) that WR disGrace can change their minds, in this trial, in putting a witness on the stand, on their behalf, against the GOVT. with evidence, to put him on that stand and then change their minds and not put him on the stand. What is with that? Maybe, just maybe that witness could solve this case. Maybe that witness can expose criminal conduct and activity with in the medical profession in Libby/Missoula and Kalispell and even Spokane… Some thing sure ain’t square here. Course nothing is, in this miscarriage of Justice, of no victims, by people who don’t matter any way.Oh well. Such is what we endure huh. I think/believe, Dr. Sellman has evidence and withholding this evidence I believe is criminal..knowledge. I was looking forward to this truth…

Comment from Bryan
Time May 6, 2009 at 7:57 am

If Dr. Sellman has evidence, its criminal that the government didn’t find it and use it.

Comment from Mike Crill Missoula,Mt
Time May 6, 2009 at 8:24 am

Bryan…I know!!!!! Alot of criminal going around for everyone. We shall see if Justice exists. Ain’t been none since 1963, it is about time to stop killing more people by lieing to them that Libby is safe. The Govt is not on trial here but then neither is WR disGrace….Still guilty either way….

Write a comment