Tag: Rule 29
Week 10: Two defendants walk, defense promises short case as they take the field
During the past week, Judge Donald Molloy dismissed two defendants, ruled on two critical motions and revealed a deadline for his ruling on another.
The prosecution said that they didn’t have enough evidence to prove their case against Robert Walsh on April 27 and defendant William McCaig on April 30. Three defendants remain to face the [...]
Posted: May 1st, 2009 under News.
Tags: Eschenbach, Geiger, Grant, Jury, Locke, Lundquist, McCaig, Rule 29, Week 10, Wolter, Wood
Comments: 19
Defense examines Lockes’ relationship with the prosecution
After lying under oath in his first testimony, former W.R. Grace employee Robert Locke took the stand one last time Tuesday afternoon.
But this time, he wasn’t asked about Grace, Libby, or even asbestos. He was asked about his special relationship with government attorneys and agents.
With the jurors present once again, Judge Donald Molloy told [...]
Posted: April 28th, 2009 under News.
Tags: acquittal, Flandro, Locke, Marsden, Rule 29
Comments: none
Molloy will not dismiss trial for misconduct; acquittal question still open
Judge Donald Molloy ruled Tuesday morning that he would not dismiss the W.R. Grace case for alleged prosecutorial misconduct. The understated announcement came after the prosecution had completed its response to the arguments for dismissal or acquittal made by the defense Monday.
Molloy also ruled that Robert Locke, the former Grace executive who was a [...]
Posted: April 28th, 2009 under News.
Tags: Bettacchi, Lundquist, Rule 29
Comments: none
Bernick argues prosecutorial misconduct warrants dismissal
 Judge Molloy first ruled on the Government’s motion for admission of redacted exhibits. See Motion. These rulings are of importance to the Rule 29 motions because the government has signaled that unless the exhibits are admitted, it will drop the conspiracy charges as to defendants Walsh and McCaig. See footnote 1, page 5 of Government’s [...]
Posted: April 27th, 2009 under Law.
Tags: Cavan, Goldade, Lemen, Locke, Miller, prosecutorial misconduct, Rule 29
Comments: 1
Oral argument requested
  The parties have filed their motions and briefs on the Rule 29 Motions for Acquittal and the Motions to Dismiss for Prosecutorial Misconduct. The motions will likely be argued Monday, April 27, a day reserved for legal arguments outside the presence of the jury. The prosecutorial misconduct issue must be resolved before the Rule [...]
Posted: April 26th, 2009 under Law.
Tags: acquittal, Lofing, Rule 29
Comments: 1
Court to Resume Monday with Arguments to Acquit and Dismiss
  After a short court week, the parties will return to court Monday morning for arguments on two different pending motions: motions for dismissal due to prosecutorial misconduct and motions to acquit for insufficient evidence (Rule 29 motions).
The intersection of these legal manuevers by the defense places the case in an interesting procedural position. The [...]
Posted: April 25th, 2009 under Law.
Tags: acquittal, Rule 29
Comments: 14