Main menu:

March 2, 2009

Day 8: All blog posts filed Monday, March 2, 2009, are duplicated here in reverse chronological order. Read from the bottom up.

Frustrated judge calls court for the day, orders Parkers to the stand

Inkwell thumbnail Monday morning’s court session was “a waste of a day,” according to Judge Donald Molloy.

The U.S. v. W.R. Grace case was unnecessarily delayed and the jurors’ overall time away from their jobs was prolonged, an agitated Molloy told a courtroom of attorneys and press, but no jury. Jurors were not present in court Monday, as Molloy and Kris A. McLean, the lead government attorney, traded words about victim-witnesses’ rights to be present in the court room.

Mel and Lerah Parker are at the center of this issue. The Libby couple, who have been diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases, wanted to watch the unfolding of the U.S. case against W.R. Grace and its executives — the chemical company and individuals who could be responsible for the Parkers’ terminal illnesses. But, because they are also witnesses for the government, Molloy ruled they could not be present in court until after their testimony — which was scheduled to come at the end of the prosecution’s case.

The Parkers appealed Molloy’s decision to exclude victim-witnesses from the courtroom and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision. It seemed that the Libby couple might have been able to be spectators for much of the case.   But  on Monday, discussion between Molloy and McLean made clear that that right won’t come without consequences  that  affect everybody involved in the case.

 The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a mandate requiring Molloy to question all of the remaining 26 witnesses to ensure that, if they did listen to the trial before their testimony, what they heard would not affect or change their own actions on the witness stand.

 Today, Molloy came prepared to question dozens of witnesses, but none were in court. McLean said that for various reasons, none of the witnesses was able to come. McLean also said that, in light of the lengthy process and the time it would consume for the victim-witnesses to be allowed in court, the Parkers were going to waive their right to be present. But, Molloy said, that wasn’t enough. The court orders had already been issued.

“I told you four years ago that if (victim-witness exclusion) was going to be an issue, raise it,” Molloy told McLean.  ”Now, at the last minute, this goes up to the circuit and now we have a mandate telling me what to do. And now you’re telling me to ignore the mandate.”

 Molloy said whether the Parkers waived their right or not, he had to follow the lengthy procedure outlined in the court order.

“It says the court shall. I don’t have any room — SHALL,” he said.

Molloy advised McLean that, to avoid the now-required process of questioning the remaining 26 witnesses, he would need to call the Parkers as his next witnesses. That way, their right to be in court would be renewed at the end of their testimony.

That throws a kink in the prosecution’s game plan. The Parkers were set to be the last witnesses to testify. McLean also has an obligation to file a pleading to the Ninth Circuit to withdraw the mandate, Molloy said.

“This case has been going on for too long. It’s been delayed, delayed, delayed, and I’m tired of it,” Molloy said. “This case is going to be tried, and it’s going to be tried according to procedure.”

Court will reconvene Tuesday at 8:30 a.m., completing the cross examination of EPA on-site cleanup coordinator Paul Peronard before considering the Parkers as witnesses.

– Carly Flandro (posted 11:01)

Posted: March 2nd, 2009 under News.
Comments: 9 | [edit]

Molloy Suspends Trial

Darker scales of justice  On Friday, February 27, 2009, Judge Molloy filed an order suspending the jury trial and cross-examination of Paul Peronard in light of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal’s ruling regarding the rights of victim-witnesses.  The district court order stated that it would conduct proceedings to make particularized findings with respect to the remaining 26 victim-witnesses expected to testify.  The court ordered the government to call each remaining witness, one at a time, to present the entire expected testimony, including possible exhibits each witness might testify about, in order to determine if each witness was a victim-witness for the purposes of the Crime Victims Rights Act.  The court ordered the jury to be not present Monday morning for these proceedings, which would be closed to the public and media.

Over the weekend, the United States filed three motions, resulting finally in notice to the district court that none of the 26 victims desired to exercise their rights and the cross-examination of Paul Peronard could continue.  Whether we will have a jury this morning is still unknown.

Nick Lofing (posted 9:02 a.m.)

Posted: March 2nd, 2009 under Law.
Comments: 3 | [edit]

Good Morning

Inkwell thumbnail Reporter Carly Flandro will start coverage of the trial at 9 a.m. The jury will not be present, following a ruling from Judge Donald Molloy. Paul Peronard, the EPA on-site coordinator, was to finish answering questions from the defense today, but it is likely the court proceedings will center on  Molloy’s decision to exclude 34 victim-witnesses from the courtroom. That decision was reversed by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday.

Posted: March 2nd, 2009 under News.
Comments: none | [edit]